Here's a silly thing that's been preying on my brain lately: mediafandom? Stupid name. I mean, what does "media" mean? I have read enough of y'all's meta to know it isn't the NEWS media, which is what the non-fannish first thought goes to. As I see it, mediafandom seems to describe people who entered fandom through television shows (especially Xfiles, among my acquaintance), in contrast to people who were attending scifi cons and in the zine scene before this dang newfangled technology came along. Am I wrong? But then, where does Harry Potter fit in, since that seems to be in mediafandom but he's a book? Or wasn't he fannish before there were movies? I'm so confused.
Anyway, why not simply call it television-fandom, not mediafandom, and keep me from flashing to Dan Rather all the time? Also, the pedant in me wishes to observe that every mode of communication is a medium - print, television, etc.
Who made up this name?
Your mundane friend,
flea
Anyway, why not simply call it television-fandom, not mediafandom, and keep me from flashing to Dan Rather all the time? Also, the pedant in me wishes to observe that every mode of communication is a medium - print, television, etc.
Who made up this name?
Your mundane friend,
flea
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 01:54 pm (UTC)I am with you two. I mean, I understand (now, after the discussion in Lightbulb) what some of them mean (although I've been in the Boxed Set thread for months, and couldn't discern any differences between the culture there and the culture in the other TV/lit/film/music threads), but I don't get the name itself.
So glad you asked, flea. I'll await answers in this thread with bated breath.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 02:25 pm (UTC)Man, I am caffiene free so bear with me.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:25 pm (UTC)And it's not so much popular as well-known, usually through production of something, be it fic or commentary or vids or meta.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:33 pm (UTC)(Ironically, SF has a similiar acronym, SMOF, which is short for Secret Master of Fandom. Over the years, it has lost its bitchiness quotient, and is now used as a verb to mean "organize" or "be on a committee.")
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 08:49 pm (UTC)Smoffy smoffy smoffy. Sounds like a six-foot blue furry beast, doesn't it? Something the toddlers adore and their parents abominate.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 08:55 pm (UTC)I also think there should be a Whatsiscon.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:40 pm (UTC)The WIMMIN and their
cabana boysallies decamped to Other Parts, and organized their own cons and social practices, and since they mostly hewed to TV and movies -- multimedia before that word was cool --, as opposed to the primacy of the book in traditional SF circles, the WIMMIN fandom took on the name media fandom.(Rememeber, once upon a time, this shit was slow. Star Trek got cancelled in 1969, and didn't have a movie till 1980, and in between there was Star Wars, and Brit TV series, and (shudder) Starsky and Hutch. So the ur-texts of media fandom are evenly split between TV and movies; it's just that the TV end of the fandom, having something to react to every week, tends to be bigger and more fulminating, especially in the fast-paced online world.)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 04:36 pm (UTC)The fact that you don't suggests you are a great match for media fandom.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 05:08 pm (UTC)(There is a fair amount of interspecies sex, come to think, but the puppets do not have sex with the people-shaped species. That way lies crush injury.)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 04:40 pm (UTC)Also, I think that media fandom is like a gigantic women's college in this way: if you attempt to label us all as WIMMIN, the eight-foot-tall bathmats, to say nothing of the self-described girl, gurls, gurlzzz, trannies, males, hermaphrodites, and "none of the above," will all object to the formalized exclusion of their types.
So we go with a mushy, meaningless name, so as not to offend/exclude anybody with a name that might be meaningful. This is why eye-rolling is such a powerful skill in fandom.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:45 pm (UTC)It is kind of freaky to me that people really do use the term "mundane" as an insult word, meaning "those people not smart enough to see the Blazing Intelligence and Forwardlooking Excitement of SF" -- like, I thought it was ironic for a long, long time. For some (SF) people, not ironic.
Which is why I am glad that there is no common-use term for not-media-fen among the media fannish. I can only cross my eyes so many times before they stick that way.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 04:42 pm (UTC)That way lies a sad lack of kerfuffling, and where would media fandom be without kerfuffling? I ask you!
no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-05 07:59 pm (UTC)