![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In the midst of my real happiness last night about Obama's victory, I was nagged by the numbers we were seeing from Georgia. The national media called the state for McCain very early, and when I stopped looking at the internets at about 11pm the results were showing 60% McCain/40% Obama. I always thought it was a long shot that Obama could take Georgia, but I thought it had to be closer than THAT, especially with the demographics we'd seen in early voting (heavily female and black). I started to wonder if the early voting numbers were not being reported - fully or even at all - in the returns we were seeing in the press.
This morning, it looks like I was right. The New York Times is now showing GA as only 52.6% McCain, and the Atlanta Journal Constitution says that as of 7:30 this morning there may be 600,000 votes still uncounted, all early, majority heavily Democratic counties. And the AJC is saying Chambliss doesn't have the 50% majority he would need to prevent a runoff for his senate seat.
I'm surprised at how quickly I got invested in Georgia. I'm glad it's been close.
On Obama: I think he truly believes in the things he said last night, and good luck to him, and us. Leadership: such a novel thing in a president.
This morning, it looks like I was right. The New York Times is now showing GA as only 52.6% McCain, and the Atlanta Journal Constitution says that as of 7:30 this morning there may be 600,000 votes still uncounted, all early, majority heavily Democratic counties. And the AJC is saying Chambliss doesn't have the 50% majority he would need to prevent a runoff for his senate seat.
I'm surprised at how quickly I got invested in Georgia. I'm glad it's been close.
On Obama: I think he truly believes in the things he said last night, and good luck to him, and us. Leadership: such a novel thing in a president.